John McCain is set to alienate freedom and reality loving conservatives from his  campaign this week with a big throw down pander to the environmental lunacrats. But worse then that is that this guy is a fringe freedom hating mandate supporting lefty when it comes to energy and environmental laws. 

Proud Of Environmental Record

I just saw his new business surrogate (Former HP CEO  Carly Fiorina) on This Week with Georbie boy and she was simply amazing at the inability to identify the connection with why businesses don’t want to come to America or stay here anymore. She did get the taxes right. Businesses will avoid them when ever possible. 

The only other issue that draws businesses into a country is not just education, as much as that may hurt McCain’s spinsterette’s argument. It is the ease and low cost of doing business. How much are supplies? How high are property values? How many outrageous and over the top regulations and mandates will harm productivity and cut into margins? Is something as simple as keeping the lights on a sustainable cost, and reality. (let’s not forget California’s rolling blackouts )

Sure good workers are a plus, but if the costs on everything else are exponentially more, it doesn’t make sense to manufacture something there. I know this is the new neo-con  (read liberal Republican) rhetoric, but I don’t buy it. Gone are the principles of personal responsibility and accountability. Replaced are they with forced mandates and government requirements. 

McCain’s lunacratic streak for fringe lefty environmental policies is going to scare away even more businesses. His limits on energy are limits on productivity. And businesses know that. Here’s a bit to prove that businesses are very leery of President McCain. Bush Business Donors Shunning McCain for Democratic Candidates 

All 3 candidates for President are anti-business socialist thinkers when it comes to energy policy and anti-free market tendancies. If we don’t have solid conservatives in Congress to stop whoever wins the POTUS stakes we can pretty much hang up a businesses need not apply sign on our shores. 

He’s the Republican candidate. He may blame business for more things than Democrats. That is a damn shame. Then again, he does have his, we don’t need ours.

I’m amazed at how much power labor unions have over weak minded lawmakers. It is almost like they are Jedis. No seriously. The unions have so much power and control over Democrats that they can get them to pass laws that are completely against freedom, liberty, and the Constitution. 

Collective Bargaining Legislation Scheduled For A Vote On Monday, May 12

Urge your Senator to “VOTE NO!”

 

On Monday, May 12, the U.S. Senate is scheduled to begin consideration of the mandatory collective bargaining legislation, the Public Safety Employer - Employee Cooperation Act of 2007 (H.R. 980/S. 2123).  This legislation would preempt local government authority by forcing local goverments to negotiate with labor unions representing public safety officers over the terms and conditions of employment with labor regardless of state constitutions, state laws, and local laws.  The House passed this legislation last year.

NLC strongly opposes this legislation because it interferes with states rights, violates federalism principles, and may be unconstitutional.

Call your Senators and urge them to “VOTE NO” to Mandatory Collective Bargaining (S. 2123/H.R. 980). 

It is amazing to me that the very same people who object to the CIA tracking terrorist phone calls are so willing to hand over a worker’s and citizen taxpayer’s rights. 

Democrats, yes you Sen. Klobuchar (Emily’s List MN) better be careful when trying to lambast the Oil Companies for gouging consumers. You (yes, the Government) is far worse at gouging the consumers of oil and gas than the Oil Execs. 

 

Yesterday, members of the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming spent the day beating up on oil industry executives for “excessive” profits and gouging consumers at the gas pump. Lost in the political theater is the fact that those “excessive” profits are net profits: that is, profits earned after taxes are paid to government. And while the oil companies have enjoyed a few good years, history shows that government has profited more from the domestic oil industry than has its shareholders.

Recent data from the Energy Information Administration shows that since 1981—the first year of the Windfall Profits Tax—total taxes from all oil industry sources exceeded the combined profits of all companies in every year but the past three. Between 1981 and 2006, government collected $1.65 trillion in total taxes after adjusting for inflation. That is 65 percent more than the combined earnings of the 16 largest domestic oil companies during the same period.

As the chart below shows, during most of that 25 year period, government tax collections were nearly twice industry profits in any given year. Indeed, in 2002, before the recent price spikes, the industry earned a collective $20.5 billion in profits. However, government collected more than $50 billion in combined income, property, severance, and excise taxes in the same year.

So, the lesson to members of the House committee is be careful of throwing stones when you live in a glass house.

(There’s even a graph if those words don’t do it for you; click on the link above to see it and the data)

 

Oh yes, add up the gas taxes plus all the other hand in the cookie jar fees and taxes oil companies pay, and the Government is still a bigger beneficiary at the consumption of oil than those darn executives. 

Add to that this savant like quote from Pat Shortridge (via King at TN)

Gas is $3.50 a gallon and politicians are ready to lock up oil company executives. Milk is $3.50 a gallon and the same politicians can’t shovel our money to the farm lobby fast enough. What statesmen.

Oh Pat, Klobuchar is completely clueless on this one. 

Stop price gouging by oil companies. American consumers should not have to dig ever deeper into their pockets while the big oil companies amass record profits. We must eliminate oil company handouts and tax loopholes, and dedicate more funds to biofuels research and other homegrown energy sources. (Source Klobuchar Official May 5, 2008)

The taxes the Government has collected from oil companies paid for that microphone Senator. How about the Government lead by example and stop skimming off the top?

Sen. Norm Coleman ‘Independent‘ Republican of Minnesota is once again joining Democrats in the war against Bush and the end to subsidies for millionaire farmers. He’s threatening/promising to help Democrats override the likely veto of the Farm Bill.

Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn. and a member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, told reporters Thursday that he backs the Farm Bill emerging from talks between the House and Senate and will work to see the Senate override a threatened Bush veto.

“The president has indicated today he will veto the Farm Bill. That would be a terrible mistake,” Coleman said in his weekly press call. “The president’s wrong if he vetoes the Farm Bill. I will work hard to override that veto. Perhaps it won’t get to that point.”

One of Bush’s major concerns in the bill is that people who make $1.9 million a year will still be able to receive subsidies under the current farm bill.

The president is also reportedly balking at higher income limits than he proposed, with farmers making up to $1.9 million a year in combined farm and non-farm income still able to receive subsidies, well above the $200,000 annual limit Bush sought and near the $2.5 million current limit.

I’m sorry, but for all the hand wringing by farmers and ethanol loving politicians over oil profits, I am astonished that they’d have the temerity to demand millionaire farmers (or people who happen to own a or part of a farm) still be able to feed at the federal taxpayer trough.

Sen. Coleman, your opponent is self-destructing. Do you really need to go down this road? How about not acting and siding with the Democrats in their goal to protect the welfare for millionaire farmers and act like that 80% conservative your campaign manager told me so much about last year.

This post (Where Did The Revolution Go?) is starting to draw out what I think is the real motivation behind Ron Paul’s movement. 

I’ve believed from day 1 that Ron Paul was propped up by the media simply because he is an anti-war Republican. Sure there are some people who support him for his libertarian domestic agenda, but I have long held that he’s the most anti-war candidate running this cycle, of ANY party. 

If you browse through the comments of that post, you’ll see what I believe is the real motivation behind the Ron Paul campaign. They want to take the country back to the days of putting our head in the sand and fingers crossed homeland security. I’m not talking about Clinton years kind of ignoring the world. I’m talking about what lead up to Hitler’s rise to power and World War 2 where millions died. 

It would be a wonderful thing if we didn’t have to project our force and be the police force of the world, but the problem is someone has to and no one else will. We no longer live in a world where our oceans protect us from those meaning us harm. We no longer live in a world where we can be economically independent. We live in a global economy and thus it is in our best interest to try to create stability through freedom. 

It sucks, I wish we could just let the world go to hell in a bunch of thugs, dictators, terrorists, and despot’s handbags, but we can’t. 

There currently is a party that is closely aligned to the America is bad, America is the bully, America is the problem - anti-war part of the Ron Paul campaign. I believe you can find the same rhetoric and talking points, heck even bills introduced verbatim, that the Ron Paul supporters are using. It is the Democratic Party. 

Last night while finishing the fence up I had Jason Lewis on and he ripped into the Ron Paul campaign for aligning themselves with MoveOn.org. Yes the same MoveOn.org who didn’t want us to respond to 9-11 in Afghanistan. If anti-war, isolationist policies are what the Ron Paul campaign is going to turn the Republican party into, there’s going to be a big problem. 

So when I get the threats that I better be nice to the Ron Paul campaign or else….. I say bring it on.  

The reason ‘families’ are separated in the event of deportation of an illegal immigrant is because the illegal immigrant family decided to break US laws and come here….. knowing full well they aren’t supposed to be here. This line of thinking which the media adoring pushes as the reality, is complete BS.

“I’m here because of all the raids and deportations,” said Torres, whose brother was deported to Mexico two years ago. “Too many families have been separated. It’s not fair to the children.”

If you don’t want your family to be separated, stay in your home country! OR, come here legally!

Gov. Tim Pawlenty who made serious gains in the good will department with the fiscally responsible people in the state when he line item vetoed the Bonding bill, has just erased all those gains. 

The Central Corridor light-rail line, which has become a pawn in back-and-forth negotiations at the Capitol, is back in a budget proposal made by Gov. Tim Pawlenty on Wednesday.

There will be a voter revolt this November. (Barring major mishandling by the Party leadership, fingers crossed) Republicans will pick up seats in the Minnesota House. Pawlenty and Legislators are mortgaging the future of Minnesota’s children on all these pork barrel pet projects. 

Central Corridor is a boondoggle waiting to happen. Pawlenty did the right thing when he put it back on the wish list shelf. He made up for his betrayal of the taxpayer when he allowed Hennepin County to raise taxes with out a vote on the Twins tax in 2005. The rumors of him not fighting hard to sustain his veto during that Friday afternoon meeting with Republican House members still irks many fiscal conservatives. 

But his rekindled sense of fiscal sanity in cutting out the Corridor was a breathe of fresh air for many of us who see Minnesota headed toward unsustainable Government spending. But it was short lived and now I’m left to wonder if Pawlenty does have another job he will make his legacy out of. 

When in DC I was asked about Pawlenty in terms of Vice President. Of course I answered honestly and said that it would be a terrible idea. I said both McCain and Pawlenty are Big Government Republicans. Pretty solid on taxes, but terrible on spending. They are cut from the same mold. McCain needs a rock solid limited Government Conservative to balance the ticket, not pick a ticket mate that is just like him. 

I don’t think Tim pawlenty wants to be the guy who is remembered as destroying the Midway of St. Paul. I don’t think he wants to be remembered as the guy who allowed state spending to increase exponentially at a time of recession. I don’t think he wants to be remembered as the guy who has committed the state to programs, projects, and policies that will have lasting negative ramifications and huge costs hurting the state economy and forcing Minnesota citizens to sacrifice freedom, choice, and treasure. 

Pawlenty has been a decent Governor, but he has been a terrible fiscal, limited Government conservative. Like Bush has stumbled and ruined what could have been a good legacy. Bush’s, and Republicans in Congress along with him, blew it in the first half of his second term. 

Pawlenty has to have plans for the future. I don’t think being a former Governor is enough for him. I think the time spent on the campaign trail with McCain has gone to his head and rekindled the self-serving Republican in him. He is supporting flat out liberal energy and environmental problems. He is expanding the burden of Government on citizens and taxpayers. Now he is not all bad, but neither is the soon to be former President. But what they have done wrong (and those things are mostly when they worked with the Democrats on liberal agenda items) will leave lasting headaches and painful, costly policies for future generations to deal with. 

Does he really want to be another Arne Carlson? As in a former Republican Governor who left behind a legacy chalk full of liberal agenda items and policies all marked accomplished. That guy was on local morning news this AM, and he still puts a bad taste in my mouth when they introduce him as a Republican. He’s a liberal. Just look at his tenure and listen to what he says. 

So what will Tim Pawlenty’s legacy look like if his last public service act is Governor of Minnesota? What will Minnesota, and more importantly Republicans, think of his time as Governor? Unfortunately I am not too happy with his tenure so far. Central Corridor just happens to be the perfect example of how he is not acting in the best interest of all Minnesotans, let alone limited government conservatives. 

The DFL is testing him beyond, what I fear are, his limits. They are hitting where it hurts and trying to drive the final wedge between him and his base to destroy his aspirations for calling DC his home. 

Will he be known as the Republican Governor who signed into law policies that hand over control to bureaucrats  in California who get to make every single thing in Minnesota cost more, ban the sale and purchase of certain necessities deemed as tabu by feel good environmentalists, and force us all to drive Specs that have room for your arse and a bag of organic groceries? 

(long rant I know)Back to get back to the point. If the DFL will build a state park and Vet’s hospital, he’ll sign on to the billion dollar boondoggle that will destroy a historic park of our city, create added congestion rather then reduce it, and add millions in annual operating costs to already over taxed citizens at multiple levels. 

Pawlenty can save his legacy from being just another Arne, but he has to act sooner rather than tomorrow. The clock is not just ticking, the alarm already went off, Pawlenty hit the snooze button with his veto-palooza. But can he sustain the courage and backbone he had when he did that? It seems to come and go far to often to keep him from being just another Arne kinda of former Republican Governor. 

He must be trying to create an image and personality that will serve him in the recruitment to another position. Secretary Pawlenty? But of what?

Saudi Arabia of renewable energy…… how’s that working out for us?

Why are lefties (yes the League of Women Voters is a lefty group) so inclined to make sure someone can steal my vote? 

Regarding the US Supreme Court decision upholding (drum roll please) an Indiana law requiring (suspense) photo IDs in order to vote. 

For some, though, any burden is still too much. Keesha Gaskins, Executive Director of the Minnesota League of Women Voters, said the non-partisan League will oppose any future legislation that requires a photo ID.

“This puts up another barrier to voting; that’s really all there is to it. There’s been no evidence of voter fraud in Minnesota; there’s no reason to change,” Gaskins said.

The reason to change is to guarantee that every vote cast is safe and rightfully done so. Our cherished right to vote should not be left to the will of people who may try to cheat. Doing so cheapens and weakens the power of us as individuals. 

Minnesota’s Secretary of State Mark Ritchie maintains the ruling has no direct effect locally.

“Well I haven’t had a chance to read the Supreme Court ruling, and I’ll be very interested in it from just the curiosity point of view, but it had nothing to do with Minnesota law, so it won’t affect us at all,” Ritchie said.

Yes, that is the guy who is supposed to run our elections in Minnesota. Has he even looked into the case or other similar laws to Indiana’s? 

Twenty-five states currently require some ID to vote.

Why is leaving the door open to voter fraud something the liberals in the State of Minnesota want to lead the Nation in? 

All it takes is one person to cast a vote improperly to erase the vote of a person who had the right to in the first place. 

Just a reminder that the 6th CD Republicans are holding a Full Committee meeting tonight in Blaine. 

RF Flashback: National Delegate Update

It should be interesting. The Minnesota leader for the Ron Paul campaign is accusing us 6th District leaders of lying. I happen to think she needs to look with in her own ranks when she makes that claim. 

And of course I am a little worried that this Ron Paul Revelution is the ground game for something that will allow the socialists to win the White House…..(That is a 3rd party run by Paul or support for a 3rd party candidate.)

Ron Paul - So Anti-War, Even Cindy Sheehan Likes Him

In Case You Thought The Revolution Was Over #2

In Case You Thought The Revolution Was Over

Let Me Get This Right, I’m Supposed To Be A Democrat According To Ron Paul?

Hey, I’m willing to welcome y’all with open arms, but it just seems to me that this is still about Ron Paul, not growing the party.

So you wanna grow our fuel……. OK, but what happens when Mother Earth doesn’t cooperate?

Late-season snows sent corn prices higher on Monday as grain traders bid up prices in the wake of a government report showing that farmers haven’t been able to get into their fields to plant.

The slow start to what could be one of the most profitable years ever for crop farmers because of corn prices saw just 10 percent of the crop in the ground as of Sunday, far less than the 35 percent average from the last five years, the USDA report said. Minnesota farmers planted 1 percent of the crop by Sunday, but typically have 27 percent planted by now.

Meanwhile there is a ready supply of another fuel just sitting there waiting to be tapped into and used. Oh and our entire economy is based of this other one. 

I don’t know, but lunacracy seems to come to mind. You see forcing our society to grow its energy seems to be a little short sighted. After all, it isn’t like there has never been something to interrupt the growing season in the past. 

Then we could always get into the politics of Big-agri-business, or how politicians try to buy votes. 

» Farm programs damage the environment. Subsidy programs and trade barriers draw marginal farmland into production and encourage the overuse of fertilizers. Lands that might otherwise be used for parks, forests or wetlands get locked into farm use. Florida sugar cane cultivation, for example, causes substantial damage to the Everglades, yet it thrives only because of import protections.

In the distant future, historians will look back at this time in history and wonder how in the world human society survived……. or will they? (that means that maybe we’ll kill ourselves off or destroy our society and send ourselves back to the stone age with these lunacratic policies. )