Mike
Maybe the better question is why does it take a Christian, who
you dislike, to tell you Democrats how to balance a budget?
You are threatened by anyone who has authority to call
Democrats out on their raising taxes in lieu of maintaining books, accounting for unfunded liabilities and actual governance. Therefore you hate the tax professional
Bachmann. Thank goodness for Bachmann.

It matters not a whit what her religious beliefs are if she is
in congress or the presidency. But I doubt you or Damon can say that.
She believes in this country, it’s process and constitution.

Jamie

They warrant discussion and consideration.

Data and theories need to be given fair due, scientifically.

It is not enough to just cynically question the motive and disregard the hypothesis.

For example there is a list of scientist’s, (not every) climatologists and others of note who have legitimate questions yet answered by those I refer to as carbonophobes.

At the Global Warming Petition Project.
http://www.oism.org/pproject/

Is WCCOs’ Mike Fairbourne a shill or a dupe?, how about Edward Teller, PhD.

You people need to do better than that to justify all these very buisy body, know-it-all, tax and rationing polocies that you say are absolutly necessary NOW to save humanity.

And its fair to ask for our reservations and questions to be addressed.

So in return sorry douchenozzle, I have little respect for anonymous internet trolls who throw around religious attacks and simply try to demonize anyone with a differing opinion, what is your proof that Man is killing the Earth and if we don’t act tomorrow, all is lost? I see some people saying they are pretty sure. They have run some numbers through a computer and bam! Man is bad! Take away the fredoms, rights, and by goodness make the companies pay for pieces of paper to continue to operate……

What I am saying in response to your question, is that the most famous “spokespeople” for your little “plan” to “save” the Earth, are all full of grant money.. I mean hooey!

Here’s the difference between you (liberal) and me (freedom loving American) I don’t think Government should dictate how people live or even worse, force people to pay simply to pursue happiness. That’s the whole point of this. I do not believe Government has the right to do any of what is being proposed to “stop” global warming. You can argue all you want about the biased and preconceived notions by those who stand to profit most from global warming being true, but it still doesn’t mean that Government can or should do something. And then I throw into the whole idea, the things I see with my own eyes. colder winters, stories of ice coming back, the ozone holes are closed……. I know, I don’t have a piece of paper showing I am a smarte PHD, but that doesn’t mean I have to bow down to those who have them……

And that gets us back to the point of where you and I have different definitions of higher beings.

Do you have any more highly educated names you could call me? Just curious, I’m taking notes, this is quite an enlightening education you’re giving me.

I have repeatedly asked you a simple, direct question and you have repeatedly refused to answer.

I suspect that’s because answering the question would expose you as an ignorant, mouth-breathing crank who knows even less about science than he does about public policy — incredible as that seems.

I’ve talked to scientists who say it is BS. I’m sorry, it ain’t fact. You want a source? Well how about you find real data that proves it is true. Everything I have seen says it is true. Computer models……. Sorry, computer models are only as good as people who write the software and enter the data…. oh wait, funny thing about the data, James Hanson made it up.

Oh and isn’t it funny how TPaw and Steiner (?) were going to go to the North Pole, but it was too cold?

Or how great it is to see the Politicians like Klobuchar fly up to Greenland….. which is simply dumping a ton of carbon for no reason, simply due to their travel to “witness” how terrible it is up there…….

Sir, do you beat your wife?

That might be a more effective lie to disprove.

Anyone who believes in Christ can’t talk about science. He who seeks forgiveness from the Lord almighty, shall not oppose crusades against manly desires to conquer the Earth and covet the goods of thy neighbor for profit or oppression.

Obviously, as a Catholic, I can’t possibly believe my own eyes, and since my faith says one thing, I can’t possibly think for myself. What is in scripture or spoken by men or women of faith is good far all mankind and no one can have an alternative positions.

Like Catholics and abortion…… no wait, the morons voted for the (not quite born yet) baby killer Barrack Obama who didn’t miss a step in using American taxpayer dollars to fund abortions world wide …… Oh wait, bad example.

—-

Give me a break. Demonizing someone for their religion is so medieval. What’s next, witch trials? I suppose you’re going to go ahead and …..

Oh wait, you’re not supposed to have a religious test in Government……..