<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Municipal Welfare Allowed For Sanctuary Cities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.residualforces.com/2008/03/07/municipal-welfare-allowed-for-sanctuary-cities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.residualforces.com/2008/03/07/municipal-welfare-allowed-for-sanctuary-cities/</link>
	<description>A Stream of Consciousness by Andy Aplikowski on His Life, His Politics, His Dogs, His Truck, and Whatever Pleases His Fancy</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: the Lady Logician</title>
		<link>http://www.residualforces.com/2008/03/07/municipal-welfare-allowed-for-sanctuary-cities/#comment-41442</link>
		<dc:creator>the Lady Logician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residualforces.com/2008/03/07/municipal-welfare-allowed-for-sanctuary-cities/#comment-41442</guid>
		<description>Good point Sam.....

LL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Sam&#8230;..</p>
<p>LL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Municipal Welfare Allowed For Sanctuary Cities</title>
		<link>http://www.residualforces.com/2008/03/07/municipal-welfare-allowed-for-sanctuary-cities/#comment-41440</link>
		<dc:creator>Municipal Welfare Allowed For Sanctuary Cities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residualforces.com/2008/03/07/municipal-welfare-allowed-for-sanctuary-cities/#comment-41440</guid>
		<description>[...] Anglofille wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptMunicipal Welfare Allowed For Sanctuary Cities Posted by Andy on March 7th, 2008 Here’s a link to the list of Legislators and their votes on the Seifert Amendment to bar Municipal Welfare to cities that are Sanctuary Cities for Illegal Immigrants. Amendment defeated March 3, 2008 (HF3201) An amendment that would provide local government aid only to cities that allow law enforcement officials to check immigration status failed, 66 votes to 67. Result: Rejected That’s right, can’t cut off [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anglofille wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptMunicipal Welfare Allowed For Sanctuary Cities Posted by Andy on March 7th, 2008 Here’s a link to the list of Legislators and their votes on the Seifert Amendment to bar Municipal Welfare to cities that are Sanctuary Cities for Illegal Immigrants. Amendment defeated March 3, 2008 (HF3201) An amendment that would provide local government aid only to cities that allow law enforcement officials to check immigration status failed, 66 votes to 67. Result: Rejected That’s right, can’t cut off [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.residualforces.com/2008/03/07/municipal-welfare-allowed-for-sanctuary-cities/#comment-41439</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residualforces.com/2008/03/07/municipal-welfare-allowed-for-sanctuary-cities/#comment-41439</guid>
		<description>Be careful relying on the voting record.
Go watch the actually vote and you will see a bunch of those first term suburban DFLers lights either blank or red until right before the vote was closed.
Once they had the 67 votes, they swarmed to green.
So just because you see a yes by your guy, don't assume he actually voted the correct way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful relying on the voting record.<br />
Go watch the actually vote and you will see a bunch of those first term suburban DFLers lights either blank or red until right before the vote was closed.<br />
Once they had the 67 votes, they swarmed to green.<br />
So just because you see a yes by your guy, don&#8217;t assume he actually voted the correct way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
