<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vets For Thompson Leaders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.residualforces.com/2007/11/06/vets-for-thompson-leaders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.residualforces.com/2007/11/06/vets-for-thompson-leaders/</link>
	<description>A Stream of Consciousness by Andy Aplikowski on His Life, His Politics, His Dogs, His Truck, and Whatever Pleases His Fancy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 23:11:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: machoman</title>
		<link>http://www.residualforces.com/2007/11/06/vets-for-thompson-leaders/comment-page-1/#comment-40150</link>
		<dc:creator>machoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 03:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residualforces.com/2007/11/06/vets-for-thompson-leaders/#comment-40150</guid>
		<description>Fred is not consistent on the life issue -- from Novak\&#039;s latest column:

Former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) may have seriously wounded himself with his handling of the abortion issue on Sunday\&#039;s \&quot;Meet the Press.\&quot; Thompson unequivocally stated he opposed a Human Life Amendment to the Constitution, which is a plank in the Republican platform. Without prompting, he then attacked the idea of \&quot;criminalizing\&quot; abortion and locking up mothers who procure abortions -- images that are used as scare tactics by the pro-choice lobby. Throughout the long discussion of the topic, Thompson was incoherent at best and thoroughly objectionable to his party\&#039;s pro-life base at worst. He backed away from his firm opposition to the platform, but he never quite set himself right on the whole issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred is not consistent on the life issue &#8212; from Novak\&#8217;s latest column:</p>
<p>Former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) may have seriously wounded himself with his handling of the abortion issue on Sunday\&#8217;s \&#8221;Meet the Press.\&#8221; Thompson unequivocally stated he opposed a Human Life Amendment to the Constitution, which is a plank in the Republican platform. Without prompting, he then attacked the idea of \&#8221;criminalizing\&#8221; abortion and locking up mothers who procure abortions &#8212; images that are used as scare tactics by the pro-choice lobby. Throughout the long discussion of the topic, Thompson was incoherent at best and thoroughly objectionable to his party\&#8217;s pro-life base at worst. He backed away from his firm opposition to the platform, but he never quite set himself right on the whole issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: machoman</title>
		<link>http://www.residualforces.com/2007/11/06/vets-for-thompson-leaders/comment-page-1/#comment-40105</link>
		<dc:creator>machoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 06:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residualforces.com/2007/11/06/vets-for-thompson-leaders/#comment-40105</guid>
		<description>{yawn}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>{yawn}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
