I have the feeling this will bring about the end of Republican unity in the Legislature and Party, but none the less, Gov. Tim Pawlenty is going forward with plans for a special session.
After huddling for hours behind closed doors with legislative leaders, Gov. Tim Pawlenty said Wednesday that a special session to deliver flood relief to southeastern Minnesota and bridge funding is now “likely” and could be held in mid-September or earlier.
It “is” going to happen, as I have been saying for a while now.
“We reached some general understanding of the need for a special session,” Pawlenty said. “I think it’s headed in the right direction.”
Frankly Gov. Pawlenty, I believe it is heading in the left’s direction.
In a private letter sent to legislative leaders Tuesday, Pawlenty had laid out an agenda centered on flood relief, a “limited bonding bill” for roads and bridges, property tax relief and a comprehensive transportation package that could include “a reasonable gas tax increase.”
(You can see the letter by clicking here. pawlentyaug21letter.pdf)
The governor had said in an earlier letter that he wanted the gas tax increase to be temporary and offset by income tax reductions for low- and moderate-income wage earners.
That would be a revenue neutral tax shift folks. Don’t buy the spin from Pawlenty for one second. “Offset” is code word. All he is doing is taxing every single driver in the state more and cutting only a select few people’s taxes. It is a ‘revenue neutral’ tax increase on every Minnesotan.
He sounds like a Democrat for pete’s sake defending this kind of crap.
And after the talks yesterday, where is the Gov?
Pawlenty said Wednesday that he is not insisting that the gas tax be temporary or be offset by other revenue reductions. “It’s just a concept,” he said.
In other words, the Democrats wouldn’t budge, and now Pawlenty is stuck between a rock and the tax increase he himself already said he’d support. As I told one Republican insider a few days ago, this whole special session push from Pawlenty was just plain stupid, and thinking he could trust the Democrats to stay with in his framework, or honestly negotiate was very very troublesome. More troubling was the fact that the Republican Caucus was not solid. We’ve seen numerous RINOs (yes Brent there are still some there) publicly support a tax increase. Sustaining the veto is NOT an option anymore.
He [Pawlenty] acknowledged that he has gotten “some” pushback from Republicans for supporting a gas tax increase to deal with infrastructure deterioration symbolized by the Interstate 35W bridge collapse. “They’re not all that excited about it,” he said.
I am hearing that it is not just rank and file Republicans, but some members of the Legislature who are quite upset have privately voiced concerns over the ideas being discussed.
Earlier in the day, state Republican Party Chairman Ron Cary said that a gas tax increase should be a “last resort,” and that the state had not yet done a thorough enough assessment of needs.
Last resort? Nope, it is unneeded, especially since there are millions in rainy day funds for MNDOT.
For pete’s sake, what happened to the “priorities”?
Republican house leader Marty Seifert seems to be the only one sounding remotely concerned about letting the DFL back in.
“If you want a special session to be speedy, don’t be greedy,” he said with a smile. If legislators expand their list of demands, he said, “that becomes more problematic.”
The Feds have already thrown $250 million into the 35W pot. We don’t know the final costs, so we don’t know how much more, if any, we would need on the state level.
The Feds are also likely to throw in for the Southern Minnesota flooding relief.
So why do we need to rush to a special session?
Oh, that last line from the Pawlenty letter, I suppose. “Property tax relief”
You remember how the DFL planned to deal with property taxes last session don’t you? Well let me remind you, by raising taxes on businesses. We have a Minnesota economy on the verge of a recession, and here we are talking about tax increases, when we keep having budget surpluses. (ahem! that means there is plenty of money already coming in)
The other angle the DFL is chomping at the bit for is increases in LGA (municipal welfare).
And here’s the governor proposing a tax increase on gas and then opening the door for the DFL to try to raise business taxes again, and open the door to having the state bail out the Municipal level spending addicts who are the ones to blame for the high property taxes in the first place.
WTF!?
Is Governor Pawlenty trying to undo all the good will he gained from conservatives last session? Is he trying to do what he thinks is right or needs to? Does he care that he is likely to destroy what is left of the Republican party in the process?
Because frankly it sure seems like he may be trying to make things worse. We got out of the last session with out absolute liberalism taking the reigns, why in the world would he want to let them have another shot?
Does the phrase taxing peter to pay paul mean anything to politicians these days?
Sphere: Related Content