Residual Forces

A Stream of Consciousness by Andy Aplikowski on His Life, His Politics, His Dogs, His Truck, and Whatever Pleases His Fancy

looktruenorthmed.png

Get the Flash Player to see this player.
ArborTech
JK Thompson - Coming Soon
Keegan's Pub
Triple Espresso
Minnesota Vietnam Veterans Charity




  • RF's Wikio Rank

    Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Politics

  • AAA's Worthy Destinations

  • Destinations

  • Governmental

  • Minnesota Organization of Bloggers

  • Non Blog Links

  • Northern Alliance

  • Regular Residuals

  • Residual Resources

  • Troop Support

  • GOP Trouble Ahead

    Posted by Andy on May 18th, 2007

    Republican Party of Minnesota Standing Platform

    Section 9 — Defending America at Home and Abroad

    E. Strengthening our borders against the threat of terrorism and stopping the flow of illegal immigrants, and deporting illegal aliens. We are against amnesty for illegal aliens. We oppose any program that will allow illegal aliens to remain in the United States.

    Just a reminder of what the Republican Party of Minnesota’s Delegates think US immigration policies should be, in case some people have forgotten.

    Exactly what part of illegal alien don’t you get?

    I have a strong feeling if this Amnesty Bill becomes law that conservatives will be emigrating from the GOP….. again at election time.

    Think twice, vote once.

    Sphere: Related Content

    5 Responses to “GOP Trouble Ahead”

    1. bmetzler Says:

      I have a strong feeling if this Amnesty Bill becomes law that conservatives will be emigrating from the GOP….. again at election time.

      Yes, because Democrats are such strong Immigration Reform advocates. Yes, Al Franken is going to deport all those illegal immigrants when he’s elected… no wait, Mike Ceresi is going to deport… no wait, um, who are all those “conservatives” going to vote for again?

    2. mattma Says:

      The Speaker of the House will not bring it to the floor, unless the Republicans can guarantee 70 votes for passage.

      There are people on both sides of the isle that do not like this bill. Some say it’s to strong, not strong enough, needs more tweaking. It will not be passed for a while.

    3. the Lady Logician Says:

      I think Matt is right. No one on either side of the immigration debate likes this bill - which makes me think that maybe it’s not all that horrible ;-)

      LL

    4. mattma Says:

      From what I have read about what is rumored to be in the bill, I don’t like it.

    5. J. Ewing Says:

      From what I read, it says all the right things, but doesn’t guarantee or ensure nearly enough of them. The biggest fault I see is that there is no requirement for illegals to “come forward,” zero incentive for them to do so, and no “what if” if they don’t (which they won’t). It will be 1986 all over again, with massive incentives for INCREASED illegal crossing of our border, and no disincentives except for a short fence. I think it can be fixed, but I doubt it will be.

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.