Propaganda Czar
obama_joker
Residual Tweets
Help keep RF trucking
RF Googley
looktruenorthmed.png

Words To Live By
"The era of small government is over ... government has to be more proactive, more aggressive." ( Tim Pawlenty 2006)

"You're just petty politicians, who'd sooner sign onto the wisdom of a tyrant in another country, than the demands of ticked off voters in your own." (Neil Cavuto June 2008)

“I didn’t question her patriotism. I questioned her judgment.” Mr. Cheney went on: “The point I made and I’ll make it again is that Al Qaeda functions on the basis that they think they can break our will. That’s their fundamental underlying strategy, that if they can kill enough Americans or cause enough havoc, create enough chaos in Iraq, then we’ll quit and go home. And my statement was that if we adopt the Pelosi policy, that then we will validate the strategy of Al Qaeda. I said it, and I meant it.” (Vice President Cheney NYT Feb. 2007)

"A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers. (Ronald Reagan March 1, 1975)

"Oh, no! First of all, if I took one vote away from a serious candidate, it would be a sin." (Al Franken Time Magazine, 9/1/03)
Categories
Archives
Random Sidebar Badgery
Past Works

And They Told You They Had No Money for Cops

Minneapolis is going to spend $45 million over the next 10 years. That’s $4.5 million a year. This is new spending, not something that was cut somewhere else.

No it isn’t for cops. Minneapolis is going to spend $45 million to ‘end homelessness’.

Yep, for all of you out there getting raped, robbed, or murdered you’ll have to wait. RT Rybakthinks its more important to end homelessness than protect his taxpaying citizens.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
Sphere: Related Content

3 Responses to “And They Told You They Had No Money for Cops”

  1. Nordeaster says:

    Idiots!

  2. Andrew (Not Andy) says:

    So….using the high end estimate of 3000 homeless in Minneapolis….that means spending $15000 on each of them to give them free stuff that they don’t have to pay for. I’m sure that they’ll all use this opportunity to take some personal responsibility, a shower, and head to an employment agency and find some work. That way they can eventually buy a home and pay property taxes to pay back this $15000. Why don’t we just give them the cash?

    In fact, to cut out the trouble, why don’t they just pick 3000 business owners and have us write a check to our own homeless person for $15000. I’ll fire Amy, the single mom who busts her tail working for my business as a second job, making about $15000/year part time so I can afford my bum tax. They can change the name from “Heading Home Hennepin” to a government mandated “Adopt a bum” for those of us who actually give a damn enough to make something out of our lives….and the Amy’s of the world will be the ones who suffer.

  3. nate bissonette says:

    Worse, it’s $4.5 mil ON TOP OF the $102 mil they already plan to spend for this stuff (see para 6 of the news story).

    We’re looking at $45,000 a head, Andrew, the equivalent of a $20 an hour job. At that price, I know quite a few people who’d be willing to quit working for The Man and become homeless.

    Who was it that said: what you subsidize, you get more of. Get ready, MPLS. The bums are coming.